We can't say anything concrete about how John Hogg voted on decreasing availability of welfare payments
How John Hogg voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which John Hogg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Hogg on this policy.
| Division | John Hogg | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2014, 12:46 PM – Senate Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Measures) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
5th Mar 2014, 12:47 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which John Hogg could have attended.
| Division | John Hogg | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Hogg was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.