We can't say anything concrete about how Glenn Lazarus voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Glenn Lazarus voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Glenn Lazarus could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Glenn Lazarus on this policy.
| Division | Glenn Lazarus | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Glenn Lazarus could have attended.
| Division | Glenn Lazarus | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2014, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Super Trawlers - Permanent ban |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Glenn Lazarus was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.