How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should create a national integrity commission similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to detect, investigate and prevent corruption across all Commonwealth departments and agencies

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.

Division George Brandis Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which George Brandis could have attended.

Division George Brandis Supporters vote

15th Aug 2017, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Federal Anti-Corruption Commission - Create immediately

absent Yes

8th Feb 2017, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Federal Anti-Corruption Commission - Establish

absent Yes

19th Apr 2016, 6:30 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Corruption Commission - Create federal body

absent Yes

24th Feb 2016, 4:28 PM – Senate Committees - Establishment of a National Integrity Commission - Appointment

absent Yes

24th Nov 2015, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions - Donations to Political Parties - Ban certain political donations & establish independent corruption commission

absent Yes

13th Aug 2009, 9:53 AM – Senate Motions - Establish an Anti-Corruption Commission

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.