Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.

Division	George Brandis	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which George Brandis could have attended.

Division	George Brandis	Supporters vote
14th Feb 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Phase out poker machines	absent	Yes
29th Mar 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Apply the National Consumer Protection Framework	absent	Yes
12th Sep 2016, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Against gambling advertising	absent	Yes
22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA	absent	No
5th Mar 2014, 12:27 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 — In Committee — Keep schedule 1 (on gambling) unchanged	absent	No
9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.