How George Brandis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should create and coordinate a National Redress Scheme for Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse, which was recommended by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a national redress scheme for institutional abuse survivors” which George Brandis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Brandis on this policy.

Division George Brandis Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a national redress scheme for institutional abuse survivors” which George Brandis could have attended.

Division George Brandis Supporters vote

15th Sep 2016, 12:50 PM – Senate Motions - National Redress Scheme for Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse - Create and consult

absent Yes

14th Sep 2016, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Child Sexual Abuse - National redress scheme

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Brandis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.