We can't say anything concrete about how Fraser Anning voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Fraser Anning could have attended.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fraser Anning was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.