We can't say anything concrete about how Fraser Anning voted on reducing taxes for middle-income earners
How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce income tax for middle-income earners (those who earn more than $80,000 per year)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which Fraser Anning could have attended.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Jun 2018, 7:14 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - In committee - Changes to tax rates |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2018, 7:05 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Low and Middle Income Tax Offset |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2018, 6:48 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Personal Income Tax Plan) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Senator Storer's amendments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fraser Anning was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.