We can't say anything concrete about how Brett Mason voted on tighter means testing of family payments
How Brett Mason voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Brett Mason could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brett Mason on this policy.
| Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2014, 10:42 AM – Senate Family Tax Benefit (Tighter Income Test) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Brett Mason could have attended.
| Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Nov 2014, 11:40 AM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 6) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
2nd Sep 2014, 2:17 PM – Senate Minerals Resource Rent Tax Repeal and Other Measures Bill 2014 — Third Reading — Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
2nd Sep 2014, 1:51 PM – Senate Minerals Resource Rent Tax Repeal and Other Measures Bill 2014 — Reference to Committee — Adjustments to the changes made by the bill |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Brett Mason was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.