How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for the vocational education sector, which includes TAFEs, apprenticeships and traineeships

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

17th Oct 2019, 11:49 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - $1 billion to TAFE

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

24th Jun 2021, 12:29 PM – Senate Motions - Employment, Western Australia - Resources Industry skills shortage

absent Yes

17th Oct 2019, 11:31 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2019 - in Committee - The Education Investment Fund

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.