Compare how Anthony Chisholm and Marielle Smith voted on increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which either Anthony Chisholm or Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and Marielle Smith on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Marielle Smith	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which either Anthony Chisholm or Marielle Smith could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Anthony Chisholm	Marielle Smith	Supporters vote
7th Oct 2020, 5:25 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Rio Tinto	Yes	Yes	Yes
11th Jun 2020, 4:16 PM – Senate Motions - Juukan Gorge - Protect First Nations heritage	absent	absent	Yes
25th Feb 2020, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Gas Industry - Protect climate	absent	No	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine	No	-	Yes
12th Sep 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area - Protect cultural heritage values	No	-	Yes