Compare how Anthony Chisholm and Fiona Nash voted on increasing political transparency
Anthony Chisholm
Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland since July 2016
Fiona Nash
Former National Party Senator for NSW July 2005 – October 2017
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Anthony Chisholm or Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm and Fiona Nash on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
11th Mar 2009, 12:19 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea |
- | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Anthony Chisholm or Fiona Nash could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".