Compare how Andrew Bartlett and Zed Seselja voted on increasing restrictions on gambling

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Andrew Bartlett or Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Bartlett and Zed Seselja on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Andrew Bartlett	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
27th Mar 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Gambling ads	Yes	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Andrew Bartlett or Zed Seselja could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Andrew Bartlett	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
29th Jul 2019, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - A new inquiry	-	No	Yes
13th Feb 2019, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Introduced restrictions	-	absent	Yes
26th Mar 2018, 8:51 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Prohibit betting on lottery outcome	Yes	Yes	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Phase out poker machines	Yes	No	Yes
29th Mar 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Apply the National Consumer Protection Framework	-	No	Yes
12th Sep 2016, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Against gambling advertising	-	absent	Yes
22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA	-	Yes	No
5th Mar 2014, 12:27 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 — In Committee — Keep schedule 1 (on gambling) unchanged	-	Yes	No