We can't say anything concrete about how Amanda Stoker voted on treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute
How Amanda Stoker voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce anti-discrimination laws so that a person cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their COVID vaccine status
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute” which Amanda Stoker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Stoker on this policy.
| Division | Amanda Stoker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2021, 11:14 AM – Senate Covid-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating COVID vaccine status as a protected attribute” which Amanda Stoker could have attended.
| Division | Amanda Stoker | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Amanda Stoker was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.