Compare how Sam McMahon and Richard Di Natale voted on decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which either Sam McMahon or Richard Di Natale could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam McMahon and Richard Di Natale on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Richard Di Natale	Supporters vote
3rd Aug 2021, 5:51 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development - Disallow two instruments	No	-	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which either Sam McMahon or Richard Di Natale could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam McMahon	Richard Di Natale	Supporters vote
16th Jun 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - G7 resolutions	No	-	Yes
13th May 2021, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Stop funding fossil fuels	No	-	Yes
2nd Dec 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Withdraw support for Adani	No	Yes	Yes
12th Nov 2015, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - OECD Coal Subsidies - Exclude dirtiest coal fired power stations	-	Yes	Yes