We can't say anything concrete about how Nigel Scullion voted on community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites
How Nigel Scullion voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be required to seek the consent of local communities before selecting new sites for radioactive waste disposal
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nigel Scullion on this policy.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Nigel Scullion could have attended.
| Division | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Aug 2018, 5:01 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Waste - Consult with Native Title Holders |
absent | Yes |
22nd Feb 2016, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Radioactive Waste - Disposal |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nigel Scullion was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.