We can't say anything concrete about how Jacinta Nampijinpa Price voted on increasing political transparency
How Jacinta Nampijinpa Price voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price on this policy.
| Division | Jacinta Nampijinpa Price | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Jacinta Nampijinpa Price could have attended.
| Division | Jacinta Nampijinpa Price | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2023, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentary Standards - Lobbyists |
absent | Yes |
22nd Mar 2023, 3:47 PM – Senate Documents - Leader of the Government in the Senate - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
3rd Aug 2022, 3:47 PM – Senate Committees - Senators' Interests Committee - Reference |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.