We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Ayres voted on a transition plan for coal workers
How Tim Ayres voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop and implement a plan to transition workers in the coal industry to other industries (such as the renewable energy industry)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a transition plan for coal workers” which Tim Ayres could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Ayres on this policy.
| Division | Tim Ayres | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a transition plan for coal workers” which Tim Ayres could have attended.
| Division | Tim Ayres | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2020, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Transition to renewables |
absent | Yes |
9th Sep 2019, 5:07 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Clean energy industry |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Ayres was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.