Compare how Tim Ayres and Nita Green voted on market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity
![Photo of Tim Ayres](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10946.jpg)
Tim Ayres
Australian Labor Party Senator for NSW since July 2019
![Photo of Nita Green](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10950.jpg)
Nita Green
Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland since July 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should address the destruction of Australia's biodiversity by commodifying the protection of natural environments (e.g., issuing certificates or credits for biodiversity protection that can then be sold on the market)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which either Tim Ayres or Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Ayres and Nita Green on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Tim Ayres | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
5th Dec 2023, 8:59 PM – Senate Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 and Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which either Tim Ayres or Nita Green could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Tim Ayres | Nita Green | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |