We can't say anything concrete about how Sam Dastyari voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Sam Dastyari voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Sam Dastyari could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Dastyari on this policy.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Sam Dastyari could have attended.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2017, 12:24 PM – Senate Motions - Aquaculture Industry - Okehampton Bay salmon farm |
absent | Yes |
1st Dec 2014, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Super Trawlers - Permanent ban |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sam Dastyari has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.