How Lee Rhiannon voted compared to someone who agrees that landholders, particularly farmers, should be able to say no to mining and gas exploration on their land (in other words, they should be able to lock the gate)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration” which Lee Rhiannon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lee Rhiannon on this policy.

Division Lee Rhiannon Supporters vote

6th Mar 2014, 11:40 AM – Senate Landholders' Right to Refuse (Gas and Coal) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration” which Lee Rhiannon could have attended.

Division Lee Rhiannon Supporters vote

24th Nov 2015, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Landholders' right to say "no"

Yes Yes

5th Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Coal Seam Gas

Yes Yes

9th Jul 2014, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Right to say no

Yes Yes

15th May 2014, 12:14 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Bentley blockade

Yes Yes

6th Mar 2014, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Lock the Gate Alliance - Act on concerns of the Alliance

Yes Yes

13th Feb 2014, 12:23 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Landholders' right to refuse

Yes Yes

14th Nov 2013, 11:23 AM – Senate Motions - Agriculture - Coal seam gas wells

Yes Yes

How "voted consistently for" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 1
MP voted against policy 0% 25 0
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 7
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 0

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 60.0 / 60 = 100%.

And then this average agreement score