Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.

Division	Kristina Keneally	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Aboriginal heritage sites” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.

Division	Kristina Keneally	Supporters vote
7th Oct 2020, 5:25 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Rio Tinto	absent	Yes
11th Jun 2020, 4:16 PM – Senate Motions - Juukan Gorge - Protect First Nations heritage	absent	Yes
25th Feb 2020, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Gas Industry - Protect climate	No	Yes
14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.