How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that The federal government should continue to fund the National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) to fund chaplains in Australian primary and secondary schools

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.

Division John Faulkner Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which John Faulkner could have attended.

Division John Faulkner Supporters vote

26th Jun 2014, 12:51 PM – Senate Motions - Youth Mental Health - Redirect chaplaincy funding to qualified mental health workers

absent No

27th Jun 2012, 6:22 PM – Senate Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 3) 2012 - Second Reading - Replace chaplaincy with counselling

absent No

25th Nov 2009, 4:25 PM – Senate Motions - National School Chaplaincy Program - Continue program

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.