We can't say anything concrete about how John Faulkner voted on investing in climate science
How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should invest in climate science to ensure that Australia is best equipped to deal with the challenges of climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for investing in climate science” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for investing in climate science” which John Faulkner could have attended.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Feb 2008, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.