How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.

Division Jim Molan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Jim Molan could have attended.

Division Jim Molan Supporters vote

16th Jun 2021, 7:12 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee' Reference - China

absent Yes

10th Jun 2020, 6:24 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference - China

absent Yes

3rd Dec 2019, 7:10 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Australia's relationship with China

No Yes

11th Nov 2019, 5:50 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.