We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on net zero emissions by 2050
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 2:07 PM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 10:16 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jim Molan could have attended.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th May 2021, 2:32 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Extension and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Limit on Investment Mandate |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jim Molan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.