We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the subsidisation of taxpayer money into fossil fuels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2021, 5:51 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development - Disallow two instruments |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Jim Molan could have attended.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Dec 2022, 4:10 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Energy Price Relief Plan) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Fossil fuel subsidies |
absent | Yes |
26th Sep 2022, 11:23 AM – Senate Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Benefit to Australia) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Cth royality, subsidies, and costs |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - G7 resolutions |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2021, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Stop funding fossil fuels |
absent | Yes |
2nd Dec 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Withdraw support for Adani |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.