Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.

Division	Jim Molan	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Jim Molan could have attended.

Division	Jim Molan	Supporters vote
28th Nov 2022, 10:32 AM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2022-2023 and two others - in Committee - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct	absent	Yes
22nd Nov 2022, 9:18 PM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Amendment (Disaster Ready Fund) Bill 2022 - in Committee - No investment in fossil fuels	absent	Yes
26th Oct 2022, 3:43 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Underwriting New Generation Investments Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance	absent	Yes
26th Oct 2022, 10:59 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023 and another - in Committee - Beetaloo Basin Drilling Program	absent	Yes
20th Oct 2021, 4:45 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Fuel Security (Fuel Security Services Payment) Rule 2021 - Disallow	No	Yes
12th May 2021, 5:41 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Budget - Climate change	absent	Yes
12th Nov 2019, 1:49 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Coal-fired power generators	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.