We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on the Paris Climate Agreement
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Jim Molan could have attended.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 2:07 PM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 10:16 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
3rd Dec 2020, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord |
absent | No |
14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.