We can't say anything concrete about how Hollie Hughes voted on increasing access to medicinal cannabis products
How Hollie Hughes voted compared to someone who agrees that terminally ill people should be able to access medicinal cannabis products
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which Hollie Hughes could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Hollie Hughes on this policy.
| Division | Hollie Hughes | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which Hollie Hughes could have attended.
| Division | Hollie Hughes | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Mar 2023, 6:27 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2022 Measures No. 1) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Affordable medicinal cannabis |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2022, 11:13 AM – Senate Narcotic Drugs (Licence Charges) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Increase accessibility |
absent | Yes |
14th Nov 2019, 12:02 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Hollie Hughes was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.