Compare how Fiona Nash and Murray Watt voted on a national redress scheme for institutional abuse survivors

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a national redress scheme for institutional abuse survivors” which either Fiona Nash or Murray Watt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash and Murray Watt on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Murray Watt	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a national redress scheme for institutional abuse survivors” which either Fiona Nash or Murray Watt could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Murray Watt	Supporters vote
15th Sep 2016, 12:50 PM – Senate Motions - National Redress Scheme for Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse - Create and consult	No	Yes	Yes
14th Sep 2016, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Child Sexual Abuse - National redress scheme	No	Yes	Yes