Compare how Doug Cameron and Joe Ludwig voted on Senate electoral reform
Doug Cameron
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for NSW July 2008 – July 2019
Joe Ludwig
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland July 1999 – May 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should change the laws governing Senate elections to allow voters more direct control over the flow of preferences, whether they vote above or below the line
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Senate electoral reform” which either Doug Cameron or Joe Ludwig could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Doug Cameron and Joe Ludwig on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Doug Cameron | Joe Ludwig | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2016, 5:21 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | absent | Yes |
17th Mar 2016, 1:30 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | absent | Yes |
17th Mar 2016, 12:58 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - in Committee - Agree to the bill |
No | absent | Yes |
2nd Mar 2016, 11:45 AM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - First Reading - Read for the first time |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Senate electoral reform” which either Doug Cameron or Joe Ludwig could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Doug Cameron | Joe Ludwig | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |