We can't say anything concrete about how David Leyonhjelm voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How David Leyonhjelm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which David Leyonhjelm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Leyonhjelm on this policy.
| Division | David Leyonhjelm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which David Leyonhjelm could have attended.
| Division | David Leyonhjelm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Leyonhjelm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.