We can't say anything concrete about how Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted on an independent NDIS assessment process
How Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce independent assessments for access and planning decisions for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent NDIS assessment process” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells on this policy.
| Division | Concetta Fierravanti-Wells | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent NDIS assessment process” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended.
| Division | Concetta Fierravanti-Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Mar 2021, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - National Disability Insurance Scheme - Pause independent assessments |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.