Compare how Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and Nick McKim voted on the Murray Darling Basin Plan

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which either Concetta Fierravanti-Wells or Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells and Nick McKim on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Concetta Fierravanti-Wells	Nick McKim	Supporters vote
23rd Jun 2021, 7:22 PM – Senate Water Legislation Amendment (Inspector-General of Water Compliance and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Nationals' amendments	No	No	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which either Concetta Fierravanti-Wells or Nick McKim could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Concetta Fierravanti-Wells	Nick McKim	Supporters vote
21st Jun 2021 – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Support delivery of Plan	Yes	Yes	Yes