How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.

Division Arthur Sinodinos Supporters vote

9th Sep 2019, 9:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference

No Yes

13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee

absent Yes

14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.