We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2019, 9:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference |
No | Yes |
13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee |
absent | Yes |
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Arthur Sinodinos has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.