We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2012, 8:30 PM – Senate Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners |
absent | Yes |
19th Jun 2013, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Health - Inquiry into unpaid care |
absent | Yes |
23rd Aug 2012, 12:08 PM – Senate Motions - Inequality - Introduce a Federal Equality Act |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Arthur Sinodinos was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.