We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
| Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Discrimination - Against affirmative action |
absent | No |
8th Dec 2020, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Women's Economic Security - Retirement incomes |
No | Yes |
26th Aug 2020, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Inequality |
absent | Yes |
20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.