Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.

Division	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Zed Seselja could have attended.

Division	Zed Seselja	Supporters vote
20th Oct 2021, 4:45 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Fuel Security (Fuel Security Services Payment) Rule 2021 - Disallow	No	Yes
12th May 2021, 5:41 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Budget - Climate change	absent	Yes
12th Nov 2019, 1:49 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Coal-fired power generators	absent	Yes
24th Jul 2019, 12:19 PM – Senate Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Fossil fuels	absent	Yes
6th Sep 2017, 11:22 AM – Senate Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Support for Commonwealth Entities) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Fossil fuels	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Zed Seselja has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.