Compare how Katy Gallagher and Alex Antic voted on the Murray Darling Basin Plan
Katy Gallagher
Australian Labor Party Senator for ACT since July 2019
Alex Antic
Liberal Party Senator for SA since July 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should support the full delivery of the Murray Darling Basin Plan
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which either Katy Gallagher or Alex Antic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katy Gallagher and Alex Antic on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Katy Gallagher | Alex Antic | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 7:22 PM – Senate Water Legislation Amendment (Inspector-General of Water Compliance and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Nationals' amendments |
No | No | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Murray Darling Basin Plan” which either Katy Gallagher or Alex Antic could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Katy Gallagher | Alex Antic | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2021 – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Support delivery of Plan |
Yes | Yes | Yes |