We can't say anything concrete about how David Hawker voted on increasing investment in renewable energy
How David Hawker voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which David Hawker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Hawker on this policy.
| Division | David Hawker | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which David Hawker could have attended.
| Division | David Hawker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Aug 2009, 9:10 PM – Representatives Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2009 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Coalition amendments |
Yes | No |
20th Jun 2006, 6:11 PM – Representatives Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Stand as part of the question |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
David Hawker has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.