Compare how Dan Tehan and Rob Mitchell voted on deregulating undergraduate university fees
Dan Tehan
Liberal Party Representative for Wannon since August 2010
Rob Mitchell
Australian Labor Party Representative for McEwen since August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should remove limits on the amount that universities can charge students for tuition in Commonwealth Supported Places (CSPs)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which either Dan Tehan or Rob Mitchell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dan Tehan and Rob Mitchell on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Dan Tehan | Rob Mitchell | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
25th Feb 2015, 10:21 AM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
4th Sep 2014, 1:12 PM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
4th Sep 2014, 12:40 PM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for deregulating undergraduate university fees” which either Dan Tehan or Rob Mitchell could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Dan Tehan | Rob Mitchell | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |