We can't say anything concrete about how Meryl Swanson voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Meryl Swanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Meryl Swanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Meryl Swanson on this policy.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Meryl Swanson could have attended.
| Division | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2020, 4:39 PM – Representatives Foreign Investment Reform (Protecting Australia's National Security) Bill 2020 and another - Second Reading - Foreign acquisition |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Meryl Swanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.