Compare how Bruce Scott and Mark Coulton voted on Senate electoral reform
![Photo of Bruce Scott](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10565.jpg)
Bruce Scott
Former Deputy Speaker Representative for Maranoa October 2012 – May 2016
![Photo of Mark Coulton](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10152.jpg)
Mark Coulton
Deputy Speaker Representative for Parkes since August 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should change the laws governing Senate elections to allow voters more direct control over the flow of preferences, whether they vote above or below the line
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Senate electoral reform” which either Bruce Scott or Mark Coulton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bruce Scott and Mark Coulton on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Bruce Scott | Mark Coulton | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2016, 3:27 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments |
absent | Yes | Yes |
24th Feb 2016, 4:49 PM – Representatives Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Senate electoral reform” which either Bruce Scott or Mark Coulton could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Bruce Scott | Mark Coulton | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |