Compare how Louise Markus and Sharman Stone voted on increasing scrutiny of unions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions” which either Louise Markus or Sharman Stone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Louise Markus and Sharman Stone on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Louise Markus	Sharman Stone	Supporters vote
12th Dec 2013, 9:14 AM – Representatives Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of unions” which either Louise Markus or Sharman Stone could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Louise Markus	Sharman Stone	Supporters vote
no votes listed