Jason Falinski and Matt Keogh have voted the same way 1% of the time

Between July 2016 and May 2022 Jason Falinski and Matt Keogh have voted in the same division 921 times.

In divisions they have voted differently 914 times. They have only voted the same 7 times.

How do their votes on policies compare?

Policies are groups of votes related to an issue. We only show policies where we have enough information on both people.

Divisions in which they voted the same

In divisions they have voted differently 914 times. They have only voted the same 7 times.

1. edited 9th Jul 2021

   23rd Jun 2021, 7:14 PM Representatives

   Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standards and Assurance) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Do not reject bill

   Jason Falinski voted Yes

   Matt Keogh voted Yes

   Passed by a large majority

   No rebellions 54% attendance

2. edited 28th Mar 2018

   7th Dec 2017, 4:38 PM Representatives

   Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Charities

   Jason Falinski voted No in this free vote

   Matt Keogh voted No in this free vote

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 97% attendance

3. edited 28th Mar 2018

   7th Dec 2017, 3:28 PM Representatives

   Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Charitable status

   Jason Falinski voted No in this free vote

   Matt Keogh voted No in this free vote

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 95% attendance

4. edited 28th Mar 2018

   7th Dec 2017, 12:12 PM Representatives

   Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Safeguard conscientious & religious beliefs

   Jason Falinski voted No in this free vote

   Matt Keogh voted No in this free vote

   Not passed by a small majority

   No rebellions 95% attendance

5. edited 28th Mar 2018

   7th Dec 2017, 11:03 AM Representatives

   Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Def of marriage + conscientious protections

   Jason Falinski voted No in this free vote

   Matt Keogh voted No in this free vote

   Not passed by a modest majority

   No rebellions 94% attendance

6. 8th Feb 2017, 5:32 PM Representatives

   Bills — Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016; Consideration in Detail

   Jason Falinski voted No

   Matt Keogh voted No

   Not passed by a large majority

   No rebellions 58% attendance

7. edited 23rd Sep 2016

   14th Sep 2016, 11:17 AM Representatives

   Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 - Consideration in Detail - Maintain Australian Renewable Energy Agency funding

   Jason Falinski voted No

   Matt Keogh voted No

   Not passed by a large majority

   No rebellions 85% attendance