We can't say anything concrete about how Anika Wells voted on parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic
How Anika Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal parliament should continue to sit during the coronavirus pandemic
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic” which Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells on this policy.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Mar 2020, 7:07 PM – Representatives Business - Days and Hours of Meeting - No sitting days until 11 August 2020 |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic” which Anika Wells could have attended.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2020, 4:18 PM – Representatives Business - Days and Hours of Meeting - New sitting calendar |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anika Wells was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.