We can't say anything concrete about how Phillip Thompson voted on live animal export
How Phillip Thompson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Phillip Thompson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Phillip Thompson on this policy.
Division | Phillip Thompson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
26th Jun 2024, 11:41 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
26th Jun 2024, 11:32 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Decline a second reading |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Phillip Thompson could have attended.
Division | Phillip Thompson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
31st May 2023, 6:15 PM – Representatives Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports Amendment (Animal Welfare) Bill 2023 - Report from Federation Chamber - Live export bans |
absent | Yes |
27th Oct 2022, 5:56 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Export Control (Animals) Amendment (Northern Hemisphere Summer Prohibition) Rules 2022 - Don't disallow |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Phillip Thompson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.