We can't say anything concrete about how Clive Palmer voted on charging postgraduate research students fees
How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should let universities charge postgraduate research students fees
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for charging postgraduate research students fees” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
25th Feb 2015, 10:21 AM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Sep 2014, 1:12 PM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Sep 2014, 12:40 PM – Representatives Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for charging postgraduate research students fees” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clive Palmer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.