We can't say anything concrete about how Clive Palmer voted on increasing investment in renewable energy
How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
1st Sep 2014, 8:05 PM – Representatives Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Criticise abolition of ARENA |
absent | Yes |
1st Sep 2014 – Representatives Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Repeal) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
14th Jul 2014, 5:52 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Restore funding to ARENA |
No | Yes |
27th Mar 2014, 1:09 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Finance Corporation (Abolition) Bill 2013 [No. 2] - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Clive Palmer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.