We can't say anything concrete about how Ed Husic voted on live animal export
How Ed Husic voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Ed Husic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ed Husic on this policy.
Division | Ed Husic | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Ed Husic could have attended.
Division | Ed Husic | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
31st May 2023, 6:15 PM – Representatives Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports Amendment (Animal Welfare) Bill 2023 - Report from Federation Chamber - Live export bans |
absent | Yes |
27th Oct 2022, 5:56 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Export Control (Animals) Amendment (Northern Hemisphere Summer Prohibition) Rules 2022 - Don't disallow |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2012, 9:59 AM – Representatives Private Members' Business - Live Animal Exports - Condemn Minister's decision |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ed Husic was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.